Prediction of Nathan Ponwith [776th] vs Evan Bynoe [] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L W L L L W L
Form
W L W W W L W W L LHead-2-Head: Ponwith 2 - 0 Bynoe
They have played 6 sets in total, with Ponwith winning 4 and Bynoe winning 2. The last match between Ponwith and Bynoe was at the M15 Naples, 19-02-2025, First, Clay with Nathan Ponwith getting the victory 3-6 6-2 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nathan Ponwith | 2 |
| Evan Bynoe | 0 |
| Ponwith | Stats | Bynoe |
|---|---|---|
| 36% (5-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 63% (10-6) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 776 | Ranking | N/A |
| 367 | Highest Rank | |
| 26 | Age | 25 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 3 | Titles | 0 |
| 54% (184-158) | Career Total W/L | 50% (71-72) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Evan Bynoe
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
52 of
80)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
34 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
| 6-4 4-6 6-1 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Evan Bynoe
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
76%
(
59 of
78)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
37 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 31 | Games Won | 21 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 2:26:48 | Average Match Time | 2:26:48 |
| 64% (110/173) | 1st Serve % | 70% (111/158) |
| 62% (68/110) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (64/111) |
| 54% (34/63) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (20/47) |
| 46% (12/26) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (7/17) |
| 47% (74/158) | Return Points Win % | 41% (71/173) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nathan Ponwith vs Evan Bynoe Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ponwith 2 - 0 Bynoe
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ponwith has won 44.31% of points on their second serve, while Bynoe has won 45.31%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ponwith, in recent form, has won 44.57% of their opponent's second serve points, while Bynoe has won 44.09%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.86% and 34% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ponwith has saved 50.29% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bynoe has saved 55.81% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ponwith has won 40% of matches played (W/L 18/ 27), with Bynoe winning 52.17% (W/L 24/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ponwith has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 39/ 29), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 37% (W/L 10/ 17). Bynoe has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 27/ 19), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 9/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Ponwith has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 40.54% of matches (W/L 15/ 22), where as Bynoe has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52.17% of matches (W/L 24/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Ponwith winning 2 times and Bynoe being victorious 0 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Ponwith winning 4 and Bynoe winning 2. The last match between Ponwith and Bynoe was at the M15 Naples, 19-02-2025, First, Clay with Nathan Ponwith getting the victory 3-6 6-2 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:26:48.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ponwith and Bynoe have played a deciding set 2 times, with Ponwith winning 2 times and Bynoe 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ponwith winning 0, and Bynoe 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ponwith has played against opponents with an average rank of 118.91 while Bynoe has played against players with an average rank of 53.98.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ponwith has won 48% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bynoe has won 39% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ponwith has converted 37.74% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bynoe has converted 37.66% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Nathan Ponwith Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Andres Martin
Player
Nathan Ponwith
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Ian Mayew
55%
(
58 of
105)
1st Serve %
70%
(
67 of
96)
3
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
1
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
40%
(
19 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
48%
(
50 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
50 of
96)
105
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Rybakov
Player
Nathan Ponwith
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Nathan Ponwith
42%
(
33 of
78)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
67%
(
30 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
91
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andres Martin
Player
Nathan Ponwith
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
68
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Evan Zhu
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
72%
(
21 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
18 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Nathan Ponwith
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Evan Bynoe
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
52 of
80)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
34 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louis Tessa
Player
Nathan Ponwith
67%
(
61 of
91)
1st Serve %
59%
(
74 of
125)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
9
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
45%
(
41 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
62 of
125)
112
Total Points Won
104
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Trey Hilderbrand
Player
Nathan Ponwith
57%
(
54 of
95)
1st Serve %
67%
(
70 of
104)
14
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
2
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
40 of
70)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
47 of
104)
105
Total Points Won
94
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Evan Bynoe Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-4 5-7 10-7 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Isaac Nortie Nortey
Player
Evan Bynoe
51%
(
43 of
84)
1st Serve %
51%
(
45 of
89)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
35 of
45)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
89)
88
Total Points Won
85
|
7-5 6-7(1) 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-7(4) 7-6(5) 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Joshua Lapadat
Player
Evan Bynoe
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve %
55%
(
60 of
110)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
18 of
50)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
56 of
110)
101
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Evan Bynoe
Player
Jackson Ross
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
5
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Evan Bynoe
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
52 of
80)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
34 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Where To Watch Ponwith vs Bynoe?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Ponwith Vs Bynoe is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54% (184/158) | Win/Loss | 50% (71/72) |
| 53% (416/372) | Sets Win/Loss | 50% (162/159) |
| 51% (3776/3592) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (1510/1470) |
| 0.2 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 707 | Aces Total | 142 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 899 | Total Double Faults | 250 |
| 1:17:58 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 173.44 | Average Opponent Rank | 66.64 |
| 57% (9516/16629) | 1st Serve % | 63% (2806/4461) |
| 67% (6330/9516) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (1715/2806) |
| 50% (3525/7113) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (735/1655) |
| 41% (665/1613) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (182/403) |
| 39% (6374/16326) | Return Points Win % | 39% (1649/4208) |
| 54% (183/340) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (69/140) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 49% (38/78) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 44% (14/32) |
| 53% (56/105) | Deciding Set Win % | 41% (14/34) |
| 83% (187/155) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (74/64) |
| 17% (187/32) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (74/9) |
| 18% (155/28) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (69/7) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
